Public Values in the Algorithmic Society
In the evolving algorithmic society, key decisions are not made by humans alone. Datafication, sophisticated algorithms, ever more sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI) models mean that Automated Decision Systems (ADS) now complement and in part replace human decision-making.
Automation and automated decision-making
While outsourcing decision-making to (quasi-)automated systems may yield better decisions and faster and more efficient services, it transforms established routines, checks and balances, and institutions of decision-making, leading to new challenges for the realization of public values and unprecedented shifts in decision-making power. In light of the disruptive power of ADS and its implications for society, policymakers and academics alike have been pushing for ‘human-centric’ and value-sensitive ADS technology. But realizing public values in ADS requires a deeper understanding of the social, cultural, political, and economic realities of ADS; how technology, institutions, human actors, and public values interact; and the effects this has on people and society.
AlgoSoc
The OCW-funded Gravitation Program Public Values in the Algorithmic Society (AlgoSoc) is a response to the urgent need for an informed societal perspective on automation and automated decision-making. Grounded in a deep understanding of the systemic changes that ADS entail for core public institutions, for society, and for how public values are realized, AlgoSoc develops solutions for the design of governance frameworks needed to complement technology-driven initiatives in the algorithmic society.
How do we realize public values in the algorithmic society?
The overarching research question for AlgoSoc is: How do we realize public values in the algorithmic society? Towards this end, it examines not only the theoretical underpinnings of public values, but also how these values translate into institutional design, legal frameworks, and individual or societal effects.
Research questions
AlgoSoc is organized around four central research questions. To pursue these questions, our research program spans three sectors in society—justice, health, and media. While research in each sector will seek to answer these central research questions, a fourth line of research synthesizes the findings and draw on cross-sectoral insights on (the challenges of) realizing public values in the algorithmic society.
Outcome
AlgoSoc will pave the way for a new generation of researchers, trained in tackling big challenges, in interdisciplinary teams and settings. AlgoSoc will offer evidence-based policy impact, positioning the Netherlands a leading hub in how to integrate public values in the algorithmic society. AlgoSoc will ultimately offer a compass to guide the algorithmic society.
Interdisciplinary structure of the program
Advancing a societal perspective on ADS and studying the realization of public values in the algorithmic society requires interdisciplinary commitment. AlgoSoc leverages the expertise of some of the world’s highest ranking groups in communication, law, governance, health, humancentric AI, computer and data science, with an extensive web of university based research groups and initiatives. The program is led by interdisciplinary research teams, combining expertise from the social sciences, humanities, and computer science. It also draws on a wide variety of research methods from each of these disciplines, and actively involves a range of societal partners who provide cases, data, and ADS users.
More results /
AI insiders warn it could end humanity. Does the public agree?
By Ernesto de León • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026
By Natali Helberger • June 16, 2026
By José van Dijck • April 30, 2026
Loss of judicial sight? The impact of assistive AI technologies on judicial perception — beyond the question of discretion
By Iris van Domselaar • Isabella Banks • September 23, 2026
By Tynke Schepers • July 09, 2026
By Corinne Cath • May 29, 2026
Fairy Tales That Make Life Harder: AI, and the social and ethical costs of believing in it
By Martijn Logtenberg • September 28, 2026
By Martijn Logtenberg • March 13, 2026
By Martijn Logtenberg • November 20, 2025
The Label Paradox: Can AI transparency create more distrust?
By Natali Helberger • September 21, 2026
By Jin Wan • Theo Araujo • Natali Helberger • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026
By João Pedro Quintais • September 03, 2026