AlgoSoc / Opinion
July 09, 2025

Realising public values in the algorithmic society: a recap of AlgoSoc's conference

As algorithms and artificial intelligence increasingly shape our societies, the AlgoSoc conference Realising Public Values in the Algorithmic Society critically examined the societal, political, and ethical dimensions of these technologies. Rather than focusing solely on innovation, the conference explored how AI intersects with democratic values, legal systems, healthcare, media, and digital infrastructure. Through interdisciplinary dialogue, keynotes, panels, and an AI-driven art exhibition, the event highlighted the urgent need to embed public values such as fairness, transparency, and accountability into the technological systems that are rapidly transforming our world.

As algorithms and artificial intelligence play an ever-larger role in our societies, they raise urgent questions about the future we want to create. Technological advances offer tremendous opportunities, but also challenge how we safeguard public values such as fairness, privacy, and transparency.

These are not just technical issues — they are societal choices that demand critical reflection and public debate. Recent developments show how technology and political power are increasingly intertwined. What happens when powerful actors control the technologies that shape public discourse and decision-making? And what are the consequences when public values are at stake in struggles between private interests, governments, and citizens?

The AlgoSoc conference Realising Public Values in the Algorithmic Society (10-11 April 2025, Amsterdam) aimed to shift the focus from technology and the promise of innovation to the political, economic, and societal contexts in which technologies evolve.

The conference was inherently interdisciplinary. With nearly 300 participants from 23 countries, it brought together scholars, regulators, media professionals, civil society organisations, and many other stakeholders. The event featured 50 paper presentations, 3 keynotes, 10 panel discussions, 32 poster sessions — and an AI-based art exhibition by our friends at AICON.

🎬 Watch our aftermovie below and read our conference report for summaries of the keynotes and panel discussions.

As a teaser, here are some of the key lessons we drew from the conference (see below):

1. Broadening AI Research and Governance from a Tech-Focused to a Societal Perspective

In her keynote, Natali Helberger argued that to truly serve the public good, AI governance must shift focus from technical design to societal impact—placing power dynamics, human oversight, and public values at the heart of research, regulation, and innovation.

2. Rethinking Public Values and AI Governance in the Algorithmic Age

This panel emphasised that embedding public values in AI governance requires interdisciplinary collaboration, democratic control over digital infrastructures, and a stronger civic role for researchers in shaping and scrutinising technological change.

3. A Sphere-Centric Framework of Justice for the Algorithmic Society

In her thought-provoking keynote, Tamar Sharon proposed that digital technologies must respect the unique values of societal spheres like education, health, and politics—protecting their autonomy from tech-driven values such as efficiency and control.

4. Europe’s Digital Agenda in a Polarised World

Panelists stressed that to uphold public values in a fragmented global landscape, Europe must invest in sovereign digital infrastructures, challenge Big Tech dominance, and reinforce democratic institutions and academic freedom.

5. Application of AI in Healthcare

This discussion highlighted that while AI in healthcare holds great promise, progress must be rooted in cross-disciplinary collaboration, attention to data limitations, and ethical reflection on the trade-offs between innovation, equity, and care.

6. AI in the Courtroom: Realism and Oversight

As AI enters the judiciary, panelists stressed that human oversight, legal clarity, and transparency are vital to safeguard judicial independence, public trust, and the legitimacy of algorithmic tools in courts.

7. The Future of News Consumption

Algorithmic news delivery is reshaping how citizens engage with public information—raising urgent questions about exposure, diversity, and the role of platforms in sustaining democratic discourse.

8. Responsible Machine Learning in AI Health Applications

This panel concluded that deploying AI responsibly in healthcare requires legal accountability, integration of domain expertise, and continuous evaluation—ensuring that such systems enhance, rather than complicate, medical practice.

9. Algorithmic Harms, Justice, and Remedies

Ensuring justice in the algorithmic society requires systems that can be contested, inclusive design processes, and public education—making space for affected communities to challenge automated decisions and seek redress.

10. Systemic Risks of (Generative) AI

Panelists agreed that systemic risks can’t be addressed through internal audits alone—governance must be participatory, transparent, and shaped by diverse stakeholders beyond the tech industry.

11. Computational Infrastructures and Alternatives

Europe’s digital sovereignty hinges on developing public, open, and collaborative alternatives to Big Tech cloud infrastructures—grounded in public values and protected from securitisation.

12. Preventing the Disruption of Democracy

In her keynote, Marietje Schaake warned against the rise of “CEO-kings” and urged Europe to counter democratic erosion by investing in transparency, robust public information systems, and alliances for technological independence.

13. From Regulation to Resilience: Protecting Democracy in the Age of AI

This final panel called for a shift from regulation to resilience—through education, social innovation, academic engagement, and a shared vision for a democratic digital future.

More results /

/ justice
The EU AI Act: Law of Unintended Consequences?

By Sabrina Kutscher • July 02, 2025

The rise of technology courts

By Natali Helberger • March 06, 2025

/ health
AI won’t save us from the hard choices in healthcare

By Maurits Kaptein • June 06, 2025

From dialogue to decision

By Leonie Westerbeek • November 22, 2024

Discriminerende algoritmes

By Corien Prins • May 18, 2021

/ media
Imagining the Future of European Digital Infrastructures

By Agustin Ferrari Braun • July 04, 2025

Independent media has an infrastructural problem

By Agustin Ferrari Braun • April 16, 2025

Information Ecosystems and Troubled Democracy: Dutch Policy Reflections

By Agustin Ferrari Braun • Charis Papaevangelou • April 29, 2025

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the latest research results, blogs and news directly in your mailbox.

Subscribe