Justice / Publication
January 16, 2026

Combatting financial crime with AI at the crossroads of the revised EU AML/CFT regime and the AI Act

This article published by Dr. Magdalena Brewczyńska (Tilburg University) is providing an in-depth legal analysis of the interplay of the landmark EU AI Act and the recently revised Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) framework. Pointing out several instances of inconsistencies and areas of ambiguity leading to regulatory fragmentation, conceptual confusion, and practical challenges, she explores how such problematic interplay between the two regimes may negatively affect the scope and availability of the protective human rights standards enshrined in the AI Act.

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the area of Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) marks an essential shift in how financial institutions and regulators approach the fight against financial crime. In the EU, in 2024, two major regulatory projects reached key milestones: the revision of the AML/CFT framework and the adoption of the AI Act. Although these legislative efforts progressed in parallel, there appears to have been limited coordination between the drafters, resulting in considerable inconsistencies and areas of ambiguity. Even such seemingly basic – yet crucial – issues as the consistent application of the definition of an AI system, the determination of risks possibly entailed by such a system, or the terminology concerning human oversight give rise to concerns. The present article has two primary objectives: first, to provide an in-depth analysis of the interplay between the AI-relevant provisions of the revised AML/CFT framework and the AI Act, highlighting instances of conceptual confusion and practical challenges that those implementing AI in the AML/CFT area may have to face; and second, to identify and examine the areas where the problematic interplay between the two regimes may negatively affect the scope and availability of the protective human rights standards enshrined in the AI Act.

To continue reading please visit: https://journals.sagepub.com/d...

This open access article was published in New Journal of European Criminal Law 
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844251408680

Brewczyńska, M. (2026). Combatting financial crime with AI at the crossroads of the revised EU AML/CFT regime and the AI Act. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 0(0).

© Image: Unsplash/Immo Wegmann

More results /

/ algosoc
Natali Helberger Award

By Natali Helberger • January 15, 2026

De AI-industrie buit mens en aarde uit

By Roel Dobbe • November 24, 2025

/ justice
The EU AI Act: Law of Unintended Consequences?

By Sabrina Kutscher • July 02, 2025

The rise of technology courts

By Natali Helberger • March 06, 2025

/ health
Labour politics and why AI hasn't 'fixed' healthcare

By Martijn Logtenberg • November 20, 2025

AI won’t save us from the hard choices in healthcare

By Maurits Kaptein • June 06, 2025

From dialogue to decision

By Leonie Westerbeek • November 22, 2024

/ media
1 in 10 Dutch citizens are likely to ask AI for election advice. This is why they shouldn't

By Ernesto de León • Fabio Votta • Theo Araujo • Claes de Vreese • October 28, 2025

Platform observability and content governance under the DSA

By Charis Papaevangelou • Fabio Votta • September 22, 2025

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the latest research results, blogs and news directly in your mailbox.

Subscribe