Justice / Publication
January 16, 2026

Combatting financial crime with AI at the crossroads of the revised EU AML/CFT regime and the AI Act

This article published by Dr. Magdalena Brewczyńska (Tilburg University) is providing an in-depth legal analysis of the interplay of the landmark EU AI Act and the recently revised Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) framework. Pointing out several instances of inconsistencies and areas of ambiguity leading to regulatory fragmentation, conceptual confusion, and practical challenges, she explores how such problematic interplay between the two regimes may negatively affect the scope and availability of the protective human rights standards enshrined in the AI Act.

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the area of Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) marks an essential shift in how financial institutions and regulators approach the fight against financial crime. In the EU, in 2024, two major regulatory projects reached key milestones: the revision of the AML/CFT framework and the adoption of the AI Act. Although these legislative efforts progressed in parallel, there appears to have been limited coordination between the drafters, resulting in considerable inconsistencies and areas of ambiguity. Even such seemingly basic – yet crucial – issues as the consistent application of the definition of an AI system, the determination of risks possibly entailed by such a system, or the terminology concerning human oversight give rise to concerns. The present article has two primary objectives: first, to provide an in-depth analysis of the interplay between the AI-relevant provisions of the revised AML/CFT framework and the AI Act, highlighting instances of conceptual confusion and practical challenges that those implementing AI in the AML/CFT area may have to face; and second, to identify and examine the areas where the problematic interplay between the two regimes may negatively affect the scope and availability of the protective human rights standards enshrined in the AI Act.

To continue reading please visit: https://journals.sagepub.com/d...

This open access article was published in New Journal of European Criminal Law on January 13, 2026.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844251408680

Brewczyńska, M. (2026). Combatting financial crime with AI at the crossroads of the revised EU AML/CFT regime and the AI Act. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 0(0).

© Image: Unsplash/Immo Wegmann

More results /

/ algosoc
The 2026 Stevin Prize: Claes de Vreese and his academic journey

By Claes de Vreese • October 07, 2026

AI insiders warn it could end humanity. Does the public agree?

By Ernesto de León • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026

/ justice
Onderzoekers waarschuwen: AI-gebruik kan ‘rechterlijke blik’ vertroebelen

By Iris van Domselaar • Isabella Banks • October 01, 2026

Reflections on the AI-Radar 2026

By Tynke Schepers • July 09, 2026

/ health
The expectation game

By Martijn Logtenberg • March 13, 2026

Labour politics and why AI hasn't 'fixed' healthcare

By Martijn Logtenberg • November 20, 2025

/ media
The Label Paradox: Can AI transparency create more distrust?

By Natali Helberger • September 21, 2026

How does political efficacy condition clicks on politics? Understanding information-selection behavior in algorithmic feeds over time

By Jin Wan • Theo Araujo • Natali Helberger • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026

A Jug of Settled-Down Juice: AI Guidelines on Transparency Obligations

By João Pedro Quintais • September 03, 2026

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the latest research results, blogs and news directly in your mailbox.

Subscribe