January 16, 2026
Combatting financial crime with AI at the crossroads of the revised EU AML/CFT regime and the AI Act
This article published by Dr. Magdalena Brewczyńska (Tilburg University) is providing an in-depth legal analysis of the interplay of the landmark EU AI Act and the recently revised Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) framework. Pointing out several instances of inconsistencies and areas of ambiguity leading to regulatory fragmentation, conceptual confusion, and practical challenges, she explores how such problematic interplay between the two regimes may negatively affect the scope and availability of the protective human rights standards enshrined in the AI Act.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the area of Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) marks an essential shift in how financial institutions and regulators approach the fight against financial crime. In the EU, in 2024, two major regulatory projects reached key milestones: the revision of the AML/CFT framework and the adoption of the AI Act. Although these legislative efforts progressed in parallel, there appears to have been limited coordination between the drafters, resulting in considerable inconsistencies and areas of ambiguity. Even such seemingly basic – yet crucial – issues as the consistent application of the definition of an AI system, the determination of risks possibly entailed by such a system, or the terminology concerning human oversight give rise to concerns. The present article has two primary objectives: first, to provide an in-depth analysis of the interplay between the AI-relevant provisions of the revised AML/CFT framework and the AI Act, highlighting instances of conceptual confusion and practical challenges that those implementing AI in the AML/CFT area may have to face; and second, to identify and examine the areas where the problematic interplay between the two regimes may negatively affect the scope and availability of the protective human rights standards enshrined in the AI Act.
To continue reading please visit: https://journals.sagepub.com/d...
This open access article was published in New Journal of European Criminal Law on January 13, 2026.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844251408680
Brewczyńska, M. (2026). Combatting financial crime with AI at the crossroads of the revised EU AML/CFT regime and the AI Act. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 0(0).
© Image: Unsplash/Immo Wegmann
More results /
The 2026 Stevin Prize: Claes de Vreese and his academic journey
By Claes de Vreese • October 07, 2026
By Ernesto de León • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026
By Natali Helberger • June 16, 2026
Onderzoekers waarschuwen: AI-gebruik kan ‘rechterlijke blik’ vertroebelen
By Iris van Domselaar • Isabella Banks • October 01, 2026
By Iris van Domselaar • Isabella Banks • September 23, 2026
By Tynke Schepers • July 09, 2026
Fairy Tales That Make Life Harder: AI, and the social and ethical costs of believing in it
By Martijn Logtenberg • September 28, 2026
By Martijn Logtenberg • March 13, 2026
By Martijn Logtenberg • November 20, 2025
The Label Paradox: Can AI transparency create more distrust?
By Natali Helberger • September 21, 2026
By Jin Wan • Theo Araujo • Natali Helberger • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026
By João Pedro Quintais • September 03, 2026