Media / Opinion
October 23, 2026

Strengthening the media’s bargaining power over Generative AI

© Image: Unsplash/Saurav Mahto

Scientific Director Prof. Natali Helberger was recently part of a panel organized by The Data Tank, a nonprofit “think and do tank” based in Brussels focused on the responsible use of data for the common good.

The conversation revolved around how EU policy can support public interest media organizations in dealing with the entrance of generative AI on the market and the normative power that large providers of such systems have over sector dynamics. The Data Tank is conducting a line of research on this topic, and their recently published advisory report was discussed by Natali and fellow panelists Saorla McCabe (UNESCO), Maria Luisa Stasi (Council of Europe & Article 19), Paul Keller (Open Future), Tamian Derivry, (European Commission); ​Mira Milosevic (Global Forum for Media Development), ​and Wout Van Wijk (News Media Europe).

The current changes of GenAI bring deep and structural power asymmetries. As the panel noted, these require holistic solutions that strengthen collective bargaining power, and approaches that don't leave behind local, niche, or investigative outlets that provide important input but may get overlooked.

Some key points made by Natali were that the availability of choice between technological solutions, including public interest alternatives, is a prerequisite to establishing fair negotiation power. Existing risk-based regulation may reduce dependencies, but it will not make the technology better or more democratic. She highlighted that an important part of the audience’s freedom of expression is the right to benefit from innovation, and states have a positive obligation to enable that. Natali also indicates that the complexity of the topic can have a disheartening effect on individual organizations, and suggests to collectively formulate concrete action points as next steps to help set change into motion.

To this point, the panel converged towards the end of the session on the idea that technological innovation needs to be redefined as a collaborative, democratic project that works in the public interest and across national borders. In this way, generative AI can be developed locally to do more than just mitigate the risk of dependence, but also to more closely serve the needs of its users and respect their media freedom.

The Data Tank’s research is based on a multi-stage process involving a review of literature, ecosystem mapping, and consultations with practitioners and stakeholders at large; you can see an overview of their research as well as their final report here.

More results /

/ algosoc
The 2026 Stevin Prize: Claes de Vreese and his academic journey

By Claes de Vreese • October 07, 2026

AI insiders warn it could end humanity. Does the public agree?

By Ernesto de León • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026

/ justice
Socialists push for EU law on deepfakes

By João Pedro Quintais • October 23, 2026

Onderzoekers waarschuwen: AI-gebruik kan ‘rechterlijke blik’ vertroebelen

By Iris van Domselaar • Isabella Banks • October 01, 2026

/ health
The expectation game

By Martijn Logtenberg • March 13, 2026

Labour politics and why AI hasn't 'fixed' healthcare

By Martijn Logtenberg • November 20, 2025

/ media
Strengthening the media’s bargaining power over Generative AI

By Natali Helberger • October 23, 2026

The Label Paradox: Can AI transparency create more distrust?

By Natali Helberger • September 21, 2026

How does political efficacy condition clicks on politics? Understanding information-selection behavior in algorithmic feeds over time

By Jin Wan • Theo Araujo • Natali Helberger • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the latest research results, blogs and news directly in your mailbox.

Subscribe