Media / Publication
October 03, 2024

Accepting Exclusion: Examining the (Un)Intended Consequences of Data-Driven Campaigns

© Image: Unplash/Markus Spiske

Political campaigns can use citizens’ data not just to target voters, but to deliberately leave some out. By examining political advertisement data related to the Dutch elections in 2021 and 2023, this study shows who parties excluded from online ads, and how citizens largely reject the practice.

Abstract

Using citizens’ data not only enables precise targeting of campaign messages online, but also the deliberate exclusion of certain groups of citizens. This study asks (a) to what extent have citizens been excluded from political (online) ads during the Dutch 2021 and 2023 election campaigns and (b) how acceptable citizens find the practice of exclusion. To answer these questions, we use data from the Meta Ad Targeting dataset to investigate any employed exclusion criteria by parties and rely on survey data collected during the 2023 Dutch general election to learn about citizens’ opinions. Our study reveals that political parties across the spectrum allocated less budget to targeting and excluding citizens in 2023 compared to 2021. Predominantly, exclusion is based on age, gender, and place of residence, with criteria such as political views, migration background, and religious beliefs being relatively uncommon. Despite citizens considering all forms of exclusion unacceptable, they view exclusion based on political views as the most tolerable. Moreover, individuals leaning towards the political right exhibit greater acceptance of exclusion, particularly based on migration background. In scrutinizing the extent of citizen exclusion from political campaign messaging and citizens’ perceptions, we contribute to the discourse on the unintended consequences of data-driven campaigning.

To continue reading please visit: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8685

This open access article was published in Media and Communication on 3 October 2024.

Minihold, S., & Votta, F. (2024). Accepting Exclusion: Examining the (Un)Intended Consequences of Data-Driven Campaigns. Media and Communication, 12(0). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8685

Keywords: Citizens, Data-driven campaign, Exclusion, Information asymmetry, Meta ad targeting dataset

More results /

/ justice
Reflections on the AI-Radar 2026

By Tynke Schepers • July 09, 2026

Artificial Intentions: Winner’s Inherently Political Artifacts, AI and Government

By Esther Keymolen • Donovan van der Haak • April 01, 2026

/ health
The expectation game

By Martijn Logtenberg • March 13, 2026

Labour politics and why AI hasn't 'fixed' healthcare

By Martijn Logtenberg • November 20, 2025

AI won’t save us from the hard choices in healthcare

By Maurits Kaptein • June 06, 2025

/ media
Rethinking European media infrastructures

By Corinne Cath • Agustin Ferrari Braun • Seda Gürses • July 13, 2026

Shared responsibility, unequal power: Mapping the limitations of multi-stakeholderism in the EU’s digital governance

By Charis Papaevangelou • Sabrina Kutscher • Natali Helberger • José van Dijck • Thomas Poell • June 01, 2026

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the latest research results, blogs and news directly in your mailbox.

Subscribe