October 03, 2024
Accepting Exclusion: Examining the (Un)Intended Consequences of Data-Driven Campaigns
Political campaigns can use citizens’ data not just to target voters, but to deliberately leave some out. By examining political advertisement data related to the Dutch elections in 2021 and 2023, this study shows who parties excluded from online ads, and how citizens largely reject the practice.
Abstract
Using citizens’ data not only enables precise targeting of campaign messages online, but also the deliberate exclusion of certain groups of citizens. This study asks (a) to what extent have citizens been excluded from political (online) ads during the Dutch 2021 and 2023 election campaigns and (b) how acceptable citizens find the practice of exclusion. To answer these questions, we use data from the Meta Ad Targeting dataset to investigate any employed exclusion criteria by parties and rely on survey data collected during the 2023 Dutch general election to learn about citizens’ opinions. Our study reveals that political parties across the spectrum allocated less budget to targeting and excluding citizens in 2023 compared to 2021. Predominantly, exclusion is based on age, gender, and place of residence, with criteria such as political views, migration background, and religious beliefs being relatively uncommon. Despite citizens considering all forms of exclusion unacceptable, they view exclusion based on political views as the most tolerable. Moreover, individuals leaning towards the political right exhibit greater acceptance of exclusion, particularly based on migration background. In scrutinizing the extent of citizen exclusion from political campaign messaging and citizens’ perceptions, we contribute to the discourse on the unintended consequences of data-driven campaigning.
To continue reading please visit: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8685
This open access article was published in Media and Communication on 3 October 2024.
Minihold, S., & Votta, F. (2024). Accepting Exclusion: Examining the (Un)Intended Consequences of Data-Driven Campaigns. Media and Communication, 12(0). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8685
Keywords: Citizens, Data-driven campaign, Exclusion, Information asymmetry, Meta ad targeting dataset
Author
See also
AI transparency in political campaigns: The CampAIgn Tracker for the 2025 German Election
By Fabio Votta • February 24, 2025
What data reveals about Meta and Google’s political ad ban in the EU
By Fabio Votta • November 05, 2025
The EU is going too far with political advertising!
By Natali Helberger • Claes de Vreese • April 20, 2023
AI and Political Communication
By Claes de Vreese • May 15, 2023
More results /
AI insiders warn it could end humanity. Does the public agree?
By Ernesto de León • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026
By Natali Helberger • June 16, 2026
By José van Dijck • April 30, 2026
Loss of judicial sight? The impact of assistive AI technologies on judicial perception — beyond the question of discretion
By Iris van Domselaar • Isabella Banks • September 23, 2026
By Tynke Schepers • July 09, 2026
By Corinne Cath • May 29, 2026
By Martijn Logtenberg • November 20, 2025
By Jacqueline Kernahan • Richard Bartels • Mark de Reuver • Daniel Oberski • Roel Dobbe • October 20, 2025
The Label Paradox: Can AI transparency create more distrust?
By Natali Helberger • September 21, 2026
By Jin Wan • Theo Araujo • Natali Helberger • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026
By João Pedro Quintais • September 03, 2026
