Media / Publication
November 30, 2025

Classifying TikToks Locally: Political Content Detection with Phi-4 on Android

© Image: Unsplash/Solen Feyissa

Can AI directly analyze political content displayed on phones without sending sensitive screen data to the cloud? This study finds that LLMs running locally can do so privately, but their current speed limitations point to hybrid methods as the most practical path for mobile media research.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT-4o and Phi-4 have demonstrated great potential in identifying complex semantic content, such as political discourse, especially in cloud or desktop-based settings. However, their application on mobile devices, where privacy concerns are high, remains largely unexplored. Mobile phones have become the main way people access political discussions and news. This study investigates whether local execution of LLMs can serve as a viable, privacy-preserving way for analyzing political content seen on mobile screens. Using a Google Pixel 9, we benchmarked Phi-4 with 2,000 OCR-extracted text samples from TikTok screen recordings, comparing classification latency and feasibility. While results show that local classification is possible, latency is high, averaging over 14 seconds per sample. Although dictionary-based methods are faster, they lack the semantic flexibility of LLMs. Our findings suggest a hybrid approach and targeted frame selection strategies could enable scalable, privacy-friendly mobile media analysis in the near future.

To continue reading please visit: https://doi.org/10.1145/3771882.3773943

This open access article was published in the Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia on 30 November 2025.

Krieter, P., de León, E., Votta, F., & Roşca, A. (2025). Classifying TikToks Locally: Political Content Detection with Phi-4 on Android. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, MUM ’25, 436–438. https://doi.org/10.1145/3771882.3773943

Keywords: Political content, Human-centered computing, Ubiquitous and mobile computing systems and tools

More results /

/ justice
Reflections on the AI-Radar 2026

By Tynke Schepers • July 09, 2026

Artificial Intentions: Winner’s Inherently Political Artifacts, AI and Government

By Esther Keymolen • Donovan van der Haak • April 01, 2026

/ health
The expectation game

By Martijn Logtenberg • March 13, 2026

Labour politics and why AI hasn't 'fixed' healthcare

By Martijn Logtenberg • November 20, 2025

AI won’t save us from the hard choices in healthcare

By Maurits Kaptein • June 06, 2025

/ media
Rethinking European media infrastructures

By Corinne Cath • Agustin Ferrari Braun • Seda Gürses • July 13, 2026

Shared responsibility, unequal power: Mapping the limitations of multi-stakeholderism in the EU’s digital governance

By Charis Papaevangelou • Sabrina Kutscher • Natali Helberger • José van Dijck • Thomas Poell • June 01, 2026

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the latest research results, blogs and news directly in your mailbox.

Subscribe