July 18, 2025
How do media contribute to the dissemination of conspiracy beliefs? A field study combining panel and web tracking at the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic
As COVID-19 escalated into a global health crisis, pandemic-related conspiracy theories emerged rapidly. Understanding how and under which conditions media influence their dissemination is essential.
Abstract
This study leverages unique data from 2-wave survey panels in Germany and German-speaking Switzerland, along with online tracking, to explore how individuals’ preexisting beliefs and media exposure influence the formation of pandemic-related conspiracy beliefs. The findings reveal direct exposure effects: alternative media, when supporting the conspiratorial claims, fostered conspiracy beliefs while mainstream media reduced conspiracy beliefs after debunking. Preexisting beliefs further conditioned these effects: individuals with strong populist views or low political trust selectively engaged with alternative media and selectively avoided mainstream sources. This resulted in two indirect pathways to the dissemination of conspiracy beliefs: people who selected into conspiracy-supporting content on alternative media experienced a reinforcement of conspiracy beliefs whereas people who (partially) avoided mainstream media counterargued the conspiracy-opposing information, also strengthening their conspiracy beliefs.
To continue reading please visit: https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaf033
This open access article was published in the Journal of Communication on 18 July 2025
Adam, S., Rohrbach, T., Keller, F., Makhortykh, M., de León, E., Valli, C., Baghumyan, A., & Sydorova, M. (2026). How do media contribute to the dissemination of conspiracy beliefs? A field study combining panel and web tracking at the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Communication, 76(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaf033
Keywords: conspiracy theory, conspiracy beliefs, conspiracy exposure, motivated reasoning, web tracking, mixed methods
More results /
AI insiders warn it could end humanity. Does the public agree?
By Ernesto de León • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026
By Natali Helberger • June 16, 2026
By José van Dijck • April 30, 2026
Loss of judicial sight? The impact of assistive AI technologies on judicial perception — beyond the question of discretion
By Iris van Domselaar • Isabella Banks • September 23, 2026
By Tynke Schepers • July 09, 2026
By Corinne Cath • May 29, 2026
Fairy Tales That Make Life Harder: AI, and the social and ethical costs of believing in it
By Martijn Logtenberg • September 28, 2026
By Martijn Logtenberg • March 13, 2026
By Martijn Logtenberg • November 20, 2025
The Label Paradox: Can AI transparency create more distrust?
By Natali Helberger • September 21, 2026
By Jin Wan • Theo Araujo • Natali Helberger • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026
By João Pedro Quintais • September 03, 2026