Media / Publication
July 18, 2025

How do media contribute to the dissemination of conspiracy beliefs? A field study combining panel and web tracking at the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic

© Image: Unsplash/Napendra Singh

As COVID-19 escalated into a global health crisis, pandemic-related conspiracy theories emerged rapidly. Understanding how and under which conditions media influence their dissemination is essential.

Abstract

This study leverages unique data from 2-wave survey panels in Germany and German-speaking Switzerland, along with online tracking, to explore how individuals’ preexisting beliefs and media exposure influence the formation of pandemic-related conspiracy beliefs. The findings reveal direct exposure effects: alternative media, when supporting the conspiratorial claims, fostered conspiracy beliefs while mainstream media reduced conspiracy beliefs after debunking. Preexisting beliefs further conditioned these effects: individuals with strong populist views or low political trust selectively engaged with alternative media and selectively avoided mainstream sources. This resulted in two indirect pathways to the dissemination of conspiracy beliefs: people who selected into conspiracy-supporting content on alternative media experienced a reinforcement of conspiracy beliefs whereas people who (partially) avoided mainstream media counterargued the conspiracy-opposing information, also strengthening their conspiracy beliefs.

To continue reading please visit: https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaf033

This open access article was published in the Journal of Communication on 18 July 2025

Adam, S., Rohrbach, T., Keller, F., Makhortykh, M., de León, E., Valli, C., Baghumyan, A., & Sydorova, M. (2026). How do media contribute to the dissemination of conspiracy beliefs? A field study combining panel and web tracking at the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Communication, 76(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaf033

Keywords: conspiracy theory, conspiracy beliefs, conspiracy exposure, motivated reasoning, web tracking, mixed methods

More results /

/ algosoc
AI insiders warn it could end humanity. Does the public agree?

By Ernesto de León • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026

Hou DigiD uit Amerikaanse handen nu het nog kan

By José van Dijck • April 30, 2026

/ health
The expectation game

By Martijn Logtenberg • March 13, 2026

Labour politics and why AI hasn't 'fixed' healthcare

By Martijn Logtenberg • November 20, 2025

/ media
The Label Paradox: Can AI transparency create more distrust?

By Natali Helberger • September 21, 2026

How does political efficacy condition clicks on politics? Understanding information-selection behavior in algorithmic feeds over time

By Jin Wan • Theo Araujo • Natali Helberger • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026

A Jug of Settled-Down Juice: AI Guidelines on Transparency Obligations

By João Pedro Quintais • September 03, 2026

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the latest research results, blogs and news directly in your mailbox.

Subscribe