December 28, 2025
Large language models
This entry examines the role of LLMs in political communication research, tracing their development and key concepts, and discussing opportunities and challenges.
Large language models (LLMs) represent a significant advancement for the field of political communication. Their capabilities for the study of language vastly surpass previous approaches, enabling a wider and more generalized array of applications. The introduction of models like BERT revolutionized political communication research by enhancing the accuracy of text classification tasks. However, it was the release of ChatGPT that captured widespread public attention, establishing LLMs as a cornerstone of artificial intelligence in public perception. This entry examines the role of LLMs in political communication research, tracing their development and key concepts, and discussing opportunities and challenges. LLMs can reduce costs while improving accuracy compared to traditional methods of content analysis. Generative LLMs (gLLMs), such as those developed by OpenAI, have pushed the boundaries of text understanding and generation. Besides these advancements, significant concerns remain regarding biases, reproducibility, and ethical considerations. Addressing these challenges is crucial for harnessing the potential of LLMs.
To continue reading please visit:
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035301447.vol2.00087
This book chapter was published in the Elgar Encyclopedia of Political Communication on 28 December 2025.
Gruber, J. B., & Votta, F. A. (2025). "Large language models". In Elgar Encyclopedia of Political Communication. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035301447.vol2.00087
Keywords: Natural language processing (NLP); Quantitative text analysis; Machine learning; Generative artificial intelligence (AI); Big data
More results /
AI insiders warn it could end humanity. Does the public agree?
By Ernesto de León • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026
By Natali Helberger • June 16, 2026
By José van Dijck • April 30, 2026
Loss of judicial sight? The impact of assistive AI technologies on judicial perception — beyond the question of discretion
By Iris van Domselaar • Isabella Banks • September 23, 2026
By Tynke Schepers • July 09, 2026
By Corinne Cath • May 29, 2026
Fairy Tales That Make Life Harder: AI, and the social and ethical costs of believing in it
By Martijn Logtenberg • September 28, 2026
By Martijn Logtenberg • March 13, 2026
By Martijn Logtenberg • November 20, 2025
The Label Paradox: Can AI transparency create more distrust?
By Natali Helberger • September 21, 2026
By Jin Wan • Theo Araujo • Natali Helberger • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026
By João Pedro Quintais • September 03, 2026