April 16, 2026
Regulatory entrepreneurship’s threat to digital sovereignty: the case of Worldcoin in Kenya
This article analyses the case of Worldcoin’s entry into Kenya and the controversies that ensued.
Abstract
Worldcoin operated in regulatory grey areas where, on the one hand, it minimally complied with data protection regulations. On the other hand, the company collected biometric data from Kenyans, a venture that was successful because it allowed it to exchange sensitive data for cryptocurrency. Considering that Kenyans had previously contested the national biometric identification project, Huduma Namba, we analyse the case of Worldcoin in Kenya through the lens of regulatory entrepreneurship. We find that Worldcoin exploited conditions in the Kenyan regulatory environment, and was partially successful in taking advantage of legal uncertainty, using cryptocurrency as an incentive to grow fast, and engaging with the executive to lobby for its position. However, the company also encountered political, legal, and regulatory pushback that eventually led to the closing of the project. The case provides important lessons for regulators, policymakers, and other stakeholders in the governance of emerging artificial intelligence (AI). It adds to a growing list of actions by local agencies using existing laws and frameworks to assert digital sovereignty in response to emerging technology applications.
To continue reading please visit: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scag010
This open access article was published in Science and Public Policy on 16 April 2026.
Mutung’u, G., Martin, A., & Brewczyńska, M. (2026). Regulatory entrepreneurship’s threat to digital sovereignty: The case of Worldcoin in Kenya. Science and Public Policy, 53(2), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scag010
Keywords: artificial intelligence, biometrics, digital identity, data governance, data protection, digital sovereignty
Author
See also
Combatting financial crime with AI at the crossroads of the revised EU AML/CFT regime and the AI Act
By Magdalena Brewczyńska • January 16, 2026
Regulating digitalised financial spaces: The way towards just distribution of burdens and benefits
By Magdalena Brewczyńska • Shirley Kempeneer • December 17, 2025
More results /
AI insiders warn it could end humanity. Does the public agree?
By Ernesto de León • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026
By Natali Helberger • June 16, 2026
By José van Dijck • April 30, 2026
Loss of judicial sight? The impact of assistive AI technologies on judicial perception — beyond the question of discretion
By Iris van Domselaar • Isabella Banks • September 23, 2026
By Tynke Schepers • July 09, 2026
By Corinne Cath • May 29, 2026
Fairy Tales That Make Life Harder: AI, and the social and ethical costs of believing in it
By Martijn Logtenberg • September 28, 2026
By Martijn Logtenberg • March 13, 2026
By Martijn Logtenberg • November 20, 2025
The Label Paradox: Can AI transparency create more distrust?
By Natali Helberger • September 21, 2026
By Jin Wan • Theo Araujo • Natali Helberger • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026
By João Pedro Quintais • September 03, 2026
