October 25, 2025
Taking a SEAT: Predicting Value Interpretations from Sentiment, Emotion, Argument, and Topic Annotations
This study tests whether language models can better predict how individuals interpret human values by learning from their prior annotation behaviour, rather than relying only on demographic characteristics. Providing examples across sentiment, emotion, argument, and topic annotations improved predictions, highlighting the value of designing AI systems that account for diverse individual perspectives.
Abstract
Our interpretation of value concepts is shaped by our sociocultural background and lived experiences, and is thus subjective. Recognizing individual value interpretations is important for developing AI systems that can align with diverse human perspectives and avoid bias toward majority viewpoints. To this end, we investigate whether a language model can predict individual value interpretations by leveraging multi-dimensional subjective annotations as a proxy for their interpretive lens. That is, we evaluate whether providing examples of how an individual annotates Sentiment, Emotion, Argument, and Topics (SEAT dimensions) helps a language model in predicting their value interpretations. Our experiment across different zero- and few-shot settings demonstrates that providing all SEAT dimensions simultaneously yields superior performance compared to individual dimensions and a baseline where no information about the individual is provided. Furthermore, individual variations across annotators highlight the importance of accounting for the incorporation of individual subjective annotators. To the best of our knowledge, this controlled setting, although small in size, is the first attempt to go beyond demographics and investigate the impact of annotation behavior on value prediction, providing a solid foundation for future large-scale validation.
To continue reading please visit: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.01976
This open access article was presented at the Third International Workshop on Value Engineering in AI (VALE 2025) on 25 October 2025.
Dobrinoiu, A. N., Marcu, A. C., Homayounirad, A., Siebert, L. C., & Liscio, E. (2025). Taking a SEAT: Predicting Value Interpretations from Sentiment, Emotion, Argument, and Topic Annotations. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.01976
Keywords: Values, Value Prediction, Value Classification, LLMs, Subjectivity
More results /
AI insiders warn it could end humanity. Does the public agree?
By Ernesto de León • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026
By Natali Helberger • June 16, 2026
By José van Dijck • April 30, 2026
Loss of judicial sight? The impact of assistive AI technologies on judicial perception — beyond the question of discretion
By Iris van Domselaar • Isabella Banks • September 23, 2026
By Tynke Schepers • July 09, 2026
By Corinne Cath • May 29, 2026
Fairy Tales That Make Life Harder: AI, and the social and ethical costs of believing in it
By Martijn Logtenberg • September 28, 2026
By Martijn Logtenberg • March 13, 2026
By Martijn Logtenberg • November 20, 2025
The Label Paradox: Can AI transparency create more distrust?
By Natali Helberger • September 21, 2026
By Jin Wan • Theo Araujo • Natali Helberger • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026
By João Pedro Quintais • September 03, 2026