October 25, 2023
Why are sector transgressions so hard to govern? Reflections from Europe’s pandemic experience
In this commentary, the notion of ‘sector transgressions’ is addressed, which the researchers define as a problem of infrastructural power with features of regulatory capture.
Abstract
During the pandemic, new markets were created for public service provision in many fields, including but not limited to public health, and governments in the EU decreased regulatory controls on the private provision of public services. The results included increased government readiness to accept economic and political dependencies in return for efficiencies provided by large-scale infrastructures; decreased resistance among the general public to the private-sector takeover of what had been public tasks, and a corresponding lack of transparency about procurement and the alliances being made. We examine the features of these sector transgressions which make them difficult for civil society to resist, namely the instrumentalisation of privacy and data protection, the legalisation of transgressions through the decrease in regulatory controls, and the attractiveness to government of cheap and efficient infrastructural underpinnings to public services.
To continue reading please visit: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2264919
This open access article was published in Information, Communication and Society on 25 October 2023.
Taylor, L., Martin, A., de Souza, S. P., & Lopez-Solano, J. (2024). Why are sector transgressions so hard to govern? Reflections from Europe’s pandemic experience. Information, Communication & Society, 27(15), 2721–2725. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2264919
Keywords: Infrastructures, big data, regulation, COVID-19, political economy, legitimacy
Authors
Justice
Prof. dr. Linnet Taylor
Professor of international data governance / Tilburg University
University Profile
See also
Governing artificial intelligence means governing data: (Re)setting the agenda for data justice
By Linnet Taylor • Joan Lopez Solano • January 23, 2025
Governing AI (also) means governing markets, institutions and people
By Linnet Taylor • Joan Lopez Solano • September 02, 2025
Misperceptions of Public Opinion During Crises: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic
By Ernesto de León • May 15, 2025
More results /
AI insiders warn it could end humanity. Does the public agree?
By Ernesto de León • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026
By Natali Helberger • June 16, 2026
By José van Dijck • April 30, 2026
Loss of judicial sight? The impact of assistive AI technologies on judicial perception — beyond the question of discretion
By Iris van Domselaar • Isabella Banks • September 23, 2026
By Tynke Schepers • July 09, 2026
By Corinne Cath • May 29, 2026
Fairy Tales That Make Life Harder: AI, and the social and ethical costs of believing in it
By Martijn Logtenberg • September 28, 2026
By Martijn Logtenberg • March 13, 2026
By Martijn Logtenberg • November 20, 2025
The Label Paradox: Can AI transparency create more distrust?
By Natali Helberger • September 21, 2026
By Jin Wan • Theo Araujo • Natali Helberger • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026
By João Pedro Quintais • September 03, 2026
