Media / Publication
September 17, 2026

How does political efficacy condition clicks on politics? Understanding information-selection behavior in algorithmic feeds over time

© Image: Unsplash/Anna Keibalo

This study uses political efficacy to explain individual differences in selecting political information on algorithmic feeds. People with stronger internal political efficacy maintained stable political news use and encountered increasingly diverse sources, while less efficacious users fell behind, which points to a growing inequality in exposure diversity.

Abstract

This study uses political efficacy to explain individual differences in selecting political information on algorithmic feeds. Combining survey data and 186 Dutch individuals’ usage histories of Google Discover, a fully algorithmically curated feed, we examined both within-person changes of information-selection behavior over time and between-person differences conditioned by political efficacy in three aspects: the proportion of political information selected by users, exposure diversity as manifested via sources, and proportion of negative political information. While we did not find any longitudinal change conditioned by external efficacy on information-selection patterns, we found that internally efficacious users are more resilient to prevalent concerns about algorithms’ negative influence on political information consumption and exposure diversity. We observed their stable proportions of political information consumption and consumption from increasingly diverse sources over time. Alarmingly, there is a growing divide in exposure diversity between less and more efficacious users over time. Altogether, our study not only highlights users’ agency in navigating algorithmic environments but also underscores the importance of empowering users with account of different vulnerabilities.

To continue reading please visit: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmag022

This open access article was published in the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication on 17 September 2026.

Wan J., Araujo, T., Helberger, N., de Vreese, C., How does political efficacy condition clicks on politics? Understanding information-selection behavior in algorithmic feeds over time, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 31(5), https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmag022

Keywords: Political efficacy, Algorithmic curation, Political news, Exposure diversity

More results /

/ algosoc
AI insiders warn it could end humanity. Does the public agree?

By Ernesto de León • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026

Hou DigiD uit Amerikaanse handen nu het nog kan

By José van Dijck • April 30, 2026

/ health
The expectation game

By Martijn Logtenberg • March 13, 2026

Labour politics and why AI hasn't 'fixed' healthcare

By Martijn Logtenberg • November 20, 2025

Burying the Lead: Adjusting Goals to Manage Functional Limitations of AI Tools in Healthcare

By Jacqueline Kernahan • Richard Bartels • Mark de Reuver • Daniel Oberski • Roel Dobbe • October 20, 2025

/ media
The Label Paradox: Can AI transparency create more distrust?

By Natali Helberger • September 21, 2026

How does political efficacy condition clicks on politics? Understanding information-selection behavior in algorithmic feeds over time

By Jin Wan • Theo Araujo • Natali Helberger • Claes de Vreese • September 17, 2026

A Jug of Settled-Down Juice: AI Guidelines on Transparency Obligations

By João Pedro Quintais • September 03, 2026

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the latest research results, blogs and news directly in your mailbox.

Subscribe